Evaluating the NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot: Year 3 Report
Underlying programme report selected directly for D2. It is kept separate from the 2014 Hernandez press retelling represented by S1208.
Review state: full text read
External to Hirsch’s corpus. This work was selected by an editorial review for D2; Hirsch did not cite it in the ten books indexed here. Its zero occurrence, book, and load counts are intentional. No corpus occurrence has been inferred or created.
Identity review: Codex multi-agent D2 evidence audit; not human-signed · 2026-08-24
The full Year 3 report was checked for institutional identity, school comparison design, samples, adjusted outcomes and the absence of a randomized equity-gap estimand.
Access checked: full text read · 2026-08-24 · open checked access point
Full official report read from the CKF-hosted copy.
Independence category: CKF affiliated Official NYC programme evaluation hosted by the Core Knowledge Foundation. The evaluation team was governmental, but the public access chain is CKF-hosted and the tested curriculum, professional development and implementation support are bundled.
Evaluating the NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot: Year 3 Report · single work
Review authority: Codex multi-agent D2 evidence audit; not human-signed
NYC Department of Education Research and Policy Support Group. (2012). Evaluating the NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot: Year 3 report.
Underlying programme report selected directly for D2. It is kept separate from the 2014 Hernandez press retelling represented by S1208.
Review state: full text read
NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot Year 3 · supports A2, supports A4, qualifies A5, qualifies A6, qualifies A7, qualifies A8
matched school pilot
full official report; primary report read — Full Year 3 slide report; corpus transmission identity corrected from later press coverage
government evaluation hosted by ckf
Official NYC evaluation hosted by CKF; school assignment was not randomized and curriculum plus professional development were bundled.
A promising positive association between the CKLA pilot and multiple grade-2 measures in low-income matched schools.
A randomized programme effect, a standardized effect magnitude, income-gap convergence or isolated curriculum causation.
Open limitation: Unequal sampling and the slide report's lack of uncertainty estimates make the size less auditable than the direction.
No occurrence is shown because Hirsch did not cite this work in the ten-book corpus. The dossier appraisal above records why the editorial layer selected it.