Curator-reviewed evidence external to Hirsch’s corpus. It was selected by a dossier, not cited in the ten indexed books, and is excluded from all citation and occurrence statistics.
← Back to the registry
Corpus boundary and review provenance
External to Hirsch’s corpus. This work was selected by an editorial review for D2; Hirsch did not cite it in the ten books indexed here. Its zero occurrence, book, and load counts are intentional. No corpus occurrence has been inferred or created.
Identity review: Codex multi-agent D2 evidence audit; not human-signed · 2026-08-24
The full Johns Hopkins repository report was checked for authorship, design, sample retention, implementation classifications and pooled reading comparisons.
Access checked: full text read · 2026-08-24 · open checked access point
Full report read from the Johns Hopkins repository.
Independence category: independent A Johns Hopkins/CRESPAR evaluation conducted outside Hirsch and CKF. It is an observational matched-school programme evaluation, not a randomized independent replication; implementation classifications materially affect the reported comparison.
Reviewed source identity
Core Knowledge Curriculum: Five-Year Analysis of Implementation and Effects in Five Maryland Schools · single work
Review authority: Codex multi-agent D2 evidence audit; not human-signed
Mac Iver, M. A., Stringfield, S., & McHugh, B. (2000). Core Knowledge curriculum: Five-year analysis of implementation and effects in five Maryland schools. CRESPAR Report 50.
Primary reviewed work · study
Core Knowledge Curriculum: Five-Year Analysis of Implementation and Effects in Five Maryland Schools
Martha Abele Mac Iver, Sam Stringfield, Barbara McHugh · 2000 · CRESPAR Report 50, Johns Hopkins University
Full five-year report selected directly for D2. It is kept separate from Hirsch's unresolved generic 1996 Johns Hopkins citation in S1356.
checked record
Review state: full text read
Used in Dossier 2
Mac Iver, Stringfield and McHugh 2000 Maryland five-year evaluation · qualifies A4, qualifies A7, qualifies A8
Roleimplementation sensitive matched comparison
Access / reviewfull open report; primary report read — Full report, retention, pooled and implementation-excluded comparisons
Independence for this useexternal university evaluation
External Johns Hopkins evaluation of CK schools; evaluator independence does not remove programme and implementation selection.
Can establishThat implementation quality materially changes the apparent longitudinal result in a matched-school evaluation.
Cannot establishA clean causal CK effect or a stable policy-scale effect.
Open limitation: Pooled three-year reading gains favoured controls; the favourable CK result appears after excluding the failed-implementation pair amid substantial attrition.
Open the checked external record
Return to the D2 investigation context
Corpus citation status
No occurrence is shown because Hirsch did not cite this work in the ten-book corpus. The dossier appraisal above records why the editorial layer selected it.