External to Hirsch’s corpus. This work was selected by an editorial review for D2; Hirsch did not cite it in the ten books indexed here. Its zero occurrence, book, and load counts are intentional. No corpus occurrence has been inferred or created.
Identity review: Codex multi-agent D2 evidence audit; not human-signed · 2026-08-24
The complete methods review was read for the registered sample, grade-level results, take-up, attrition and its 'mostly well-conducted' judgment. Restricted-estimate, subgroup and component-attribution comparisons were separately checked against the Grissmer working paper and remain Atlas synthesis rather than CEBC claims.
Access checked: full text read · 2026-08-24 · open checked access point
Full web review read; linked OSF registration was not directly accessible.
Independence category: independent Methods appraisal with no identified CKF or Hirsch role. The page discloses that the reviewer's former employer, Arnold Ventures, funded the target study, so this is not a fully separate funding chain. The review reports the registered primary estimates; it is not another programme trial and does not itself analyze the publication's restricted estimates or subgroup claims.
Study Review: Core Knowledge Charter Schools · single work
Review authority: Codex multi-agent D2 evidence audit; not human-signed
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (n.d.). Study review: Core Knowledge charter schools.
Methods review reporting the preregistered sample, grade-level estimates, take-up and attrition. Comparisons with the restricted published estimates, small low-income-site analysis and curriculum-attribution claims are Atlas cross-source analysis, not findings attributed to this review.
Review state: full text read
Independent review of the Colorado lottery study · qualifies A4
prespecified primary outcome appraisal
full web review; full review read — Complete public review page, including sample, prespecified grade-6 outcome, earlier grade-4/5 estimates, take-up, attrition and quality appraisal
independent appraisal with shared funder history
No identified CKF or Hirsch role. The reviewer discloses that her former employer, Arnold Ventures, funded S0005; this is a shared-funder history, and the page is an appraisal rather than a second programme evaluation.
What its page reports: N=1,831 across nine schools; prespecified grade-6 ELA ITT .04 and TOT .09, both nonsignificant; earlier grade-4 ITT .09 nonsignificant and grade-5 ITT .12 significant; 45% take-up, 37% attrition, and a judgment that the RCT was mostly well-conducted.
The restricted .241/.473 analysis, its four-lottery and age exclusions, the low-income subgroup result, demographic gap change, component attribution or a new causal programme effect; the public page does not assess those claims.
Open limitation: This record is deliberately limited to statements on the linked CEBC page; cross-source comparisons with the working paper and registration are Atlas synthesis, not CEBC claims.
No occurrence is shown because Hirsch did not cite this work in the ten-book corpus. The dossier appraisal above records why the editorial layer selected it.